A Bethesda Office Building Saves Thousands through Commissioning

Bethesda Office Center, photo courtesy Peel Properties February 11, 2019

Bethesda Office Center, photo courtesy Peel Properties

Peel Properties of Montgomery County anticipates considerable savings on monthly operating costs at their Bethesda Office Center by participating in a utility incentive program for building commissioning (MBCx). The MBCx program is part of the larger EmPOWER Maryland’s Energy Savings for Business Program.

Rob Casteel, Senior Property Manager of Peel Properties, has worked in property management for 18 years and is well-versed in such programs. Reaping considerable savings over the years, Casteel sees the opportunity as “getting back some of the money from the utilities you’ve already paid” and views it as a win-win for other companies to do likewise. The Bethesda Office Center building is 40 years old with over 170k square feet of office space, with a few retail businesses and is currently undergoing commissioning.


What is commissioning anyway?

Put simply, commissioning (Cx) is the process of verifying that an equipment, system, plant or facility functions as intended. Commissioning helps realize the full potential of efficient equipment and minimizes the reduction in performance over time. Monitoring-Based Commissioning (MBCx) uses sensors and software to provide monitoring and a real-time account of the building systems.

Benefits of commissioning

According to DOE’s Operations and Maintenance Best Practices Guide, the actual cost savings of commissioning are difficult to estimate, but it tends to have a simple payback of less than 2 years, often less than 0.5 years.

Typical benefits of commissioning buildings and their systems include:

  • overall reduced operation and maintenance (O&M) costs
  • increased longevity of capital equipment
  • improved occupant comfort with pre-emptive maintenance
  • maintenance of certifications such as ENERGY STAR building labels
  • improved net operating income and capital valuation resulting from lowered utility costs, thereby decreasing the utility costs passed on to the tenants in the building

These energy-saving endeavors also contribute to Montgomery County’s goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 80% by 2027 and eliminating GHG emissions by 2035.

More than lighting

Like most building upgrades, the Bethesda Office Center began by updating their lighting to LED lamps.  Based on past experience in other properties, Casteel anticipates saving 10-13% on annual electrical costs just from the LED upgrades. The capital investment of just over $200K in LED lighting should generate approximately $45K per year in savings with a payback of less than 5 years for that project.

Datakwip MBCx Platform Sample Dashboard

However, the opportunities to save energy extend beyond lighting. Through the MBCx incentive program, Peel Properties has identified opportunities for savings from water heating and building controls. With the capital cost for boiler and water heater upgrades totaling less than $200K, and the estimated annual energy cost savings close to $100K, the payback for this project is less than 2 years.

In addition, no-cost projects including commissioning the building controls sequencing is projected to save an additional $68K every year, resulting in a payback of less than one year. Peel Properties uses the Datakwip MBCx Platform for commissioning. Cory Perdue, CEO of Datakwip, explained that the low initial investment was made possible because additional hardware was not required for their platform to function. The projected cost savings do not yet include the utility incentives, which are an additional $0.10/kWh once the savings are approved by the utility, reducing the payback period further.

Not too good to be true

Perdue mentioned that most people have a healthy skepticism when presented with these potential savings. Casteel agreed, “People wonder, ’What’s the catch?’ They don’t realize that they are already paying into the utility programs through their electricity bills. The utility is simply distributing that money back to them [through the EmPOWER Maryland program]. It’s more expensive for the utility to build new power plants to satisfy increasing power demand; it’s actually cheaper for them to pay customers to save.”

Who’s eligible for the commissioning program?

Commercial, industrial, and non-profit buildings — such as office and high-rise multi-family buildings, hospitals, and K-12 schools — in Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties can be eligible to participate.  The best candidates are buildings that are:

  • at least 2 years old
  • over 125,000 square feet
  • with above average electricity consumption, and
  • an Energy Management/Building Automation system (EMS/BAS).

However, Perdue shares that “Datakwip is happy to help any building or organization figure out if they qualify.  The last thing we want is for someone to assume this program isn’t for their facility. 90% of buildings that we have reviewed were found to be eligible, including buildings that have earned the ENERGY STAR label in the past.”

Not just for direct customers of Pepco

“Sorry, we don’t buy our electricity from Pepco,” many potential participants say, not realizing that they still are eligible for this program. Sam Wilson, Datakwip’s Director of Business Development, runs into this problem most often. The reality is that most electricity suppliers in the area source their electricity from Pepco. In fact, 361 electricity suppliers for commercial customers are listed under the Pepco service area as of February 2019.

A quick way to verify eligibility is to check for the EmPOWER Maryland charge on an electricity bill, listed as “Empower MD Chg,” which indicates that the customer is funding the incentive programs offered by Maryland utilities.

How the MBCx program works

Starting the process is easy, and is broken down into three phases:

  • Phase I: Approved program service providers determine eligibility and submit a contract and other application data to Pepco for review. If Pepco approves, the service provider completes an ASHRAE Level 2 audit and begins monitoring the building systems’ performance with a primary focus on HVAC and control systems. (Datakwip determines eligibility at no cost. Datakwip’s net upfront costs are roughly a couple of cents per square foot. They also help identify additional incentive programs for which the building may be eligible.)
  • Phase II: Continuous monitoring occurs, and the implementation of no or low-cost energy conservation measures (ECMs).
  • Phase III: Additional incentives are issued by Pepco after the MBCx process verifies the successful implementation of ECMs implemented in Phase II. An overarching goal of the MBCx program is to find cost-effective opportunities for building owners.

To learn more about the program, contact ICF, the program administrator for Pepco’s Energy Savings for Business Program at pepcobusiness@icf.com.
To find out if your building qualifies for the Pepco MBCx program, contact Datakwip at info@datakwip.com.


This article was prepared on behalf of Montgomery County by Energy Shrink, an MDOT certified MBE firm focused on high-performance buildings. For more information on the interviews or research, contact the authors Smita Thomas and Jennifer Jang at mail@energy-shrink.com.

2 comments on "A Bethesda Office Building Saves Thousands through Commissioning"

  1. Adam says:

    This blog post is a true gem, showcasing the remarkable achievement of the Bethesda office building in terms of energy efficiency and cost savings through commissioning. The detailed insights provided about the process and results of commissioning are not only enlightening but also serve as a great source of inspiration for other organizations aiming to enhance their operational efficiency. The way the blog highlights the substantial savings achieved is impressive and underscores the tangible benefits of investing in sustainability. This success story reinforces the notion that being environmentally conscious goes hand in hand with financial gains, and the inclusion of specific figures and data lends credibility to the narrative. Kudos to the authors for sharing this real-world example of how proactive measures can lead to a brighter, greener, and more financially sound future. It’s a testament to the positive impact that forward-thinking strategies can have on both the environment and the bottom line!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *